--- In Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> > I'm confident you won't hear any difference between 44.1 and 48. If =
> > the
> > material is destined for CD, I'd simply record at 44.1, in order to =
> > avoid
> > the need for sample rate conversion.
> >
> > Chris
>
> I agree with that, too, and I record at 44.1. A very academic question =
> of whether the advantage of a little more bandwidth is worth the trade-
> off of conversion. Both very subtle effects, probably not discernable =
> except in a very carefully controlled A-B comparison.
>
> -Dan Dugan
I would say the trade off for conversion is the extra time it takes.
But to put another angle on this question, what is the likely format of the=
near future? I was thinking that recording at 24bit 48kHz might also make =
my files more future-proof. Is valid at all? Otherwise from now on I may st=
ick to 24bit 44.1kHz.
Thanks for all the info.
Justin
|