Subject: | Re: file types |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Sat May 9, 2009 10:34 am ((PDT)) |
> I'm confident you won't hear any difference between 44.1 and 48. If > the > material is destined for CD, I'd simply record at 44.1, in order to > avoid > the need for sample rate conversion. > > Chris I agree with that, too, and I record at 44.1. A very academic question of whether the advantage of a little more bandwidth is worth the trade- off of conversion. Both very subtle effects, probably not discernable except in a very carefully controlled A-B comparison. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: file types, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: file types, justinasia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: file types, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: file types, justinasia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU