naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Equalizing, and Wave Editor?

Subject: Re: Equalizing, and Wave Editor?
From: "picnet2" picnet2
Date: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:20 am ((PDT))
Hi,
    Waveeditor uses the Izotope resampler. You can also load files with 
different sample rates and work on them direclty. Ive spent an hour just using 
Amadeus Pro - its very good I like the real time recording and spectrogram 
modes. The plug in architecture is different from wave editor. Hence a chain 
plug-ins doesn't seem possible, looks like the plugin in opened, configured 
followed by preview - then the effect is applied directly to the file. I could 
be wrong there given the short time Ive spent with the app. Waveeditor differs 
in this regard you can keep adding plug-ins to a layer or master layer to build 
up the final sound - very handy since visualization plugins are also active in 
the chain, when it all works that is :-)

Back on topic:-

Heres a baffled ducted sphere Ive made. Rob Danielson has been very kind in 
providing feedback and suggestions during its construction. 

Ive made a couple of these rigs as explained in the blog:-
http://www.urlme.net/blog/?p=870

http://urlme.net/bl/DSCF2891.JPG

Shows the interior "blue print" 

For resampling you could use SoX rather than a plug-in.
It requires some command line kung-fu, but that could be automated with 
automator to a drag and drop action (Id hope).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoX

BR,
Mike.

--- In  "justinasia" <> wrote:
>
> 
> > Due to the issues ive had with wave editor Im glad Rob posted the link to  
> > Amadeus Pro! Another candidate to try...
> > 
> > BR,
> > Mike.
> 
> Thanks guys. But what about converting 24 bit files to 16 bit? I thought one 
> of the special things about Wave Editor was that it had a good way to dither 
> and convert to 16 bit quietly. I searched the Amadeus Pro manual (and their 
> site) for "dither" and found nothing. So can it not dither? Does that mean we 
> need to buy something else (Wave Editor?) to use as well as Amadeus Pro, or, 
> is it another case of getting a plugin?
> 
> Glad you like the tree rig. It's extremely light. I also just tested it in 
> quite a reasonable breeze, and was happy to discover the speaker cloth is 
> enough to stop the wind noise, without even the little black foam covers on 
> the end of the mics - so that lets the mics lay flat against the wood, 
> maximizing the boundary effect.
> 
> Justin
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU