Subject: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:06 am ((PST)) |
>For those who own 3032s, have you use them in humid environments? Any comm= ents >on how they work on "harsh" environments (heat, humidity, etc..)? I bought two and they tested great in very humid (rain soaking homemade fuzzies) conditions. I bought two more for surround. First trip out one started frying. Reproduceable in a foggy bathroom. Sent it to A-T, got a rapid turnaround with a new capsule. In the meantime I bought a fifth, so I have a spare. Next trip out the repaired one started making noises. Sent it back again. This time they replaced the electronics, quick turnaround again. Now it's fine. -Dan Dugan P.S. whenever you have sets of identical models, label them so they become individuals. I number all my mics and cables so I know where trouble came from. -dD- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo reco, John Hartog |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: 20071104.forest.04.binaural.mp3, Suzanne Williams |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording, Antonio Celis |
Next by Thread: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU