| Subject: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording |
|---|---|
| From: | "Christian Van Horn" no_mas_films |
| Date: | Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:28 am ((PST)) |
Hello all! I'm curious to see what anyone interested has to say about this mic comparison. The 3032 on the left seems slightly more "open" and natural to me, which came as a BIG suprise. Also, I cant detect much difference in self noise with my old ears. I am about to purchase a set of 62's for use both in a parabolic and as a stereo pair...now I'm thinking it over. What do you all hear? Chris |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Who is this?, Debbi B |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording, Philip Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording, Philip Tyler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording, Philip Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU