| Subject: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob |
| Date: | Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:20 pm ((PST)) |
At 9:33 AM +0000 11/19/07, Philip Tyler wrote: > > >I am considering getting two ME62's myself which are the omni >capsule for the K6, these came out very well in a comparison done >between them and the AT3032's. Unfortunately the person who did the >comparison is no longer a member of this group and the file is not >on the remote server anymore. I don't know if anyone else has a copy >of it? I uploaded Rich's test here as a .wav file with the left channel boosted +2dB to more closely approximate the playback level of the ME62 which is on the right channel of the recording: http://ad2004.hku.nl/naturesound/RichPeet/at3032Left+2dB_me62Right.wav Rob D. -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: recording: midday at lerderderg gorge state park, victoria, Suzanne Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording, Philip Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | 20071104.forest.04.binaural.mp3, dobroide |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording, Philip Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU