| Subject: | Re: What is a natural sound? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1 |
| Date: | Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:39 am ((PDT)) |
I don't know, Rory. Have to think on that question? BK On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Rory wrote: > Hi Bernie, > > If I understood your last post correctly, it is a linguistically > challenging version of the argument in your book that frogs are > affected by jet aeroplanes. > > If you look at the examples that have been raised in this thread, > you will find that the analogy that you draw runs from irrelevant > to barely plausible to possibly plausible. > > I'd still like to know how your statements, and in particular how > your views on what is and is not nature recording, apply to the > actual question and actual examples raised in this thread. > > Cheers > > > Wild Sanctuary POB 536 Glen Ellen, CA 95442 707-996-6677 http://www.wildsanctuary.com Google Earth zooms: Earth.WildSanctuary.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What is a natural sound?, Scott Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What is a natural sound?, Bernie Krause |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What is a natural sound?, Scott Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: What is a natural sound?, Bernie Krause |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU