| Subject: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit |
|---|---|
| From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
| Date: | Mon May 14, 2007 4:25 pm ((PDT)) |
>The point that has been made is that there is very little in the way of >mics that are capable of 24 bit recording. Most don't even challenge 16 >bit. It's also useful to know that the very best A/D converters do around 20 bits. -Dan Dugan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Nature recordist conference in South Carolina on 1 June through 3 Ju, Robin Carter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit, Raimund Specht |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit, Marc Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit, Raimund Specht |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU