| Subject: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob |
| Date: | Mon May 14, 2007 7:55 am ((PDT)) |
At 3:11 PM +0100 5/14/07, david briggs wrote: >are you mad Rob ? record a field of bees ( >something I can't actually imagine ) >record them at at 8 and 16 bit process them and ...... WHY ? > >I guess Im having a laugh about it, but this is >abstacting quite far from 24bit vs 16bit...hehe > Mad and very happy. Its logical that would need a fairly even, very sustained sound to get the full dynamic range recording with 8 bits. Many Bees, many june bugs !%$, I bet there are some interesting subjects others know of. Pretty rare though it seems to me. Rob D > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit, Walter Knapp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit, Lou Judson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit, Walter Knapp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit, Lou Judson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU