Subject: | Re: Noisy Marantz PMD recorders |
---|---|
From: | "oryoki2000" oryoki2000 |
Date: | Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:02 am ((PDT)) |
"Raimund Specht" wrote: > There has always been a irrational paranoia > regarding the preamplifier noise issues... Irrational or not, my experience is that the quality of bird sounds recorded in the field improved markedly when the PMD670 was replaced by a Sound Devices 722. The same mic was used, the same cables, the same recordist, the same bit depth settings on the recorders. Only the recording device was changed. Using the PMD670, the "tape hiss" added by the preamp is distracting, to the point that the recordings are marginal for publication on CD. With the 722, the recordings are much quieter, and unquestionably are good enough for commercial publication. (This is one case where the extra money spent for the 722 does buy happiness.) That's why I say the PMD670 has noisy preamps. The PMD671 seems much improved in this regard, but I have not used the PMD671 in the field. --oryoki |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Noisy Marantz PMD recorders, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Noisy Marantz PMD recorders, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Noisy Marantz PMD recorders, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | Re: Noisy Marantz PMD recorders, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU