Subject: | mkh30/40 or mkh30/50? |
---|---|
From: | "evs" onomatopoetik |
Date: | Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:53 am ((PDT)) |
hi everyone again, now that its clear to me that i got to have the mkh mics i=B4m wondering if anyone here compared the mkh30/40 ms combination with the mkh30/50? or an equal situation with two mkh80? i don=B4t have the possibility to rent a mkh30, so i have to buy one of = those on suspicion. what i want, is to have a wider and deeper image while auditioning. i=B4m more into recording ambiance than single sounds. (but single sounds , too.) its not so important for me to have a wide view while i=B4m recording. the result is more important. is it clear what i mean? and i think i have heared that the mkh30/50 combination ironical seems to give you a wider and deeper image than if you use a mkh40.. can anyone say something to this? all the best emil |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: sanken css-5 mkh50 comparison and Floater Suspension, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: mkh30/40 or mkh30/50?, Tim Nielsen |
Previous by Thread: | sanken css-5 mkh50 comparison and Floater Suspension, evs |
Next by Thread: | Re: mkh30/40 or mkh30/50?, Tim Nielsen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU