I think you'll find the difference between the 40 and 50 fairly
subtle. In my opinion, the 40 will give you a more uniform, but
slightly less 'wide' stereo image, while the 50 will tend to provide
a more 'directional' stereo, maybe not 'wider' so to speak, but
'stronger'. Bt you can't really go wrong with either one. Some people
even use an MKH60 in there as well.
I've always used hypercardiods, the 50 in the Senn, or the MK41 in a
Schoeps rig.
On Mar 21, 2007, at 11:43 AM, evs wrote:
> hi everyone again,
> now that its clear to me that i got to have the mkh mics i=B4m
> wondering if anyone here compared the mkh30/40 ms combination with
> the mkh30/50?
> or an equal situation with two mkh80?
> i don=B4t have the possibility to rent a mkh30, so i have to buy one of
> those on suspicion.
> what i want, is to have a wider and deeper image while auditioning.
> i=B4m more into recording ambiance than single sounds. (but single
> sounds , too.)
> its not so important for me to have a wide view while i=B4m recording.
> the result is more important.
> is it clear what i mean?
> and i think i have heared that the mkh30/50 combination ironical
> seems to give you a wider and deeper image than if you use a mkh40..
> can anyone say something to this?
>
> all the best
> emil
>
>
>
|