naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: a quick recorder?

Subject: Re: a quick recorder?
From: "macmang4125" macmang4125
Date: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:21 am ((PST))
Well the Antbird did not think it was "revolting quality" in fact
quite the opposite.
Plus for an added bonus they cost 1/3 the price of the remembird!
http://www.pixmania-pro.co.uk/uk/uk/110430/art/olympus/vn-1000-digital-dictaphon.html?srcid=867

Phil


--- In  "stoatwizard" <> wrote:
>
> One of these
> 
> http://www.remembird.com/
> 
> is designed to do just that. I've played with one of these, it has a
8 second loop buffer and can record the bird song with up to 320kbps
(mono) mp3 which compressing then notes you make at 64k.
> 
> This sounds far better than the revolting quality of typical digital
voice recorders, and much less fiddly that my HiMD, though the upside
potential of the HiMD is making much better recordings using better mikes.
> 
> It date and time-stamps the recordings and manages this data in a
more intelligent way that my Olympus DVR, so you can attach a location
to a group of sounds, which is easier than trawling through the list
of datestamped wavs the Oly software does.
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU