naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [gear] preamps for field use

Subject: Re: [gear] preamps for field use
From: "Danny Meltzer" dannymeltzer
Date: Sat Sep 9, 2006 12:56 pm (PDT)
Well that's all the reason I need to saturate the tracks...

Gentlemen we have an answer.

Danny

--- In  Lou Judson <> wrote:
>
> As I understand it, if your peak level reaches -6dBFS you are using all
> the bits available. Lower than that and you are losing definition.
>
> the reference levels of -12 or -18 or -20 used in some conventions
> refers to Zero VU, not the maximum level...
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio
> 415-883-2689
>
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:29 AM, Walter Knapp wrote:
>
> > Wasn't Rob giving us a talking to a little while back about how
much we
> > lost recording that low? Particularly in 16bit. About how the lower
> > half
> > of the range did not resolve as well as the upper half? Maybe should
> > resolve that issue before going down there as a standard practice? If
> > we
> > record in the bottom 60dB of the dynamic range of a digital recorder
> > will the recording be as good as if we did so in the top 60dB?
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU