Subject: | Re: [gear] preamps for field use |
---|---|
From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
Date: | Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:32 am (PDT) |
Sorry, no disrespect intended. I am on some audio engineering elists where this is pleasurable debate, and there would be long discussion of the concepts - did not mean to diverge. <L> Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio 415-883-2689 On Sep 9, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Danny Meltzer wrote: > >> Great - though "saturate" is an analog term not really appropriate - I >> won't go into it, as your use is an anology itself. > > Well I hope we won't devolve into that level of semantic nit > picking...yes I know what saturation is... > > ...I think as a concept it has risen above its literal application to > magnetizing iron particles on plastic tape. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [gear] preamps for field use, macmang4125 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [gear] preamps for field use, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [gear] preamps for field use, macmang4125 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [gear] preamps for field use, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU