I agree with Walt. My test had too many changing conditions, was
specific to one model of mic (though it is a an appropriately versatile
model), and had too much background noise for it to qualify as anything
official or even elevated.
I would like to help develop the server idea, with a protocol to follow.
Others with more experience than me could help with protocol, but I'd be
happy to .asp write code to present forms for data input and file
upload, handle presentation of accumulated data and searches.
Bruce Wilson
http://wilson.dynu.net
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Walter Knapp
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:58 AM
To:
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Bruce's Stereo Array test (was The
right stereo setup
Posted by: "Rob Danielson"
> I wonder if it would be possible to get Bruce's test linked in the
> yahoo group home page or some other official/visible place? Here the
> list of the arrays he used:
>
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-
04/msg00338.html
It's hardly a definitive or inclusive test. Doing as you suggest would
elevate it above other possible mic brands, patterns or samples. I don't
think it's appropriate to do that. Unless you want to make it the
official recommendation of naturerecordists or something like that? If
someone wants to set up a server containing all samples posted by
everybody with no priorities, that would be more appropriate. Each
person in the group has their own likes and dislikes and non of those
are definitive. Often recordings by different people of different
subjects bring entirely different conclusions.
Walt
|