Subject: | Re: Bruce's Stereo Array test (was The right stereo setup |
---|---|
From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
Date: | Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:58 am (PDT) |
Posted by: "Rob Danielson" > I wonder if it would be possible to get Bruce's test linked in the > yahoo group home page or some other official/visible place? Here the > list of the arrays he used: > http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-0= 4/msg00338.html It's hardly a definitive or inclusive test. Doing as you suggest would elevate it above other possible mic brands, patterns or samples. I don't think it's appropriate to do that. Unless you want to make it the official recommendation of naturerecordists or something like that? If someone wants to set up a server containing all samples posted by everybody with no priorities, that would be more appropriate. Each person in the group has their own likes and dislikes and non of those are definitive. Often recordings by different people of different subjects bring entirely different conclusions. Walt |
Previous by Date: | Re: Interpreting Spectrograms, Ed Anson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Bruce's Stereo Array test (was The right stereo setup, Bruce Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | Bruce's Stereo Array test (was The right stereo setup, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Bruce's Stereo Array test (was The right stereo setup, Bruce Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU