Derek,
FWIW, I can't comment or compare to other mics but most of the stuff I
submitted to sountransit was made with the shure 183's into a marantz
pmd-670, I think the steam tractor recording was with a set of
homemade panasonic type binaurals.
I've sewed 183's into a hat and then monitor with in ear monitoring
headphones...fairly quick and easy set up. They do great on the noise
handling issue, the wind screens they come with are adequate for most
situations but are not optimal...there is lots on these mics in the
archives here...
I recently picked up a pair of NT1-A's because for very quiet
environments I was disappointed when using my marantz. It might very
well be a different story if using the 183's with a Sound Devices
recorder...
Also these seem quite rugged and survived sudden rain fall I got stuck in..=
.
Best of luck...
Toby (Denver)
On 5/21/06, derek holzer <> wrote:
> I'd like some feedback on the different mics that people use out there fo=
r
> headmounted binaural/semi-binaural recording. The main contenders seem to
> be (in order of cost):
>
> Shure WL-183 [USD 500 ???]
> Sonic Studios DSM-1 [USD 600 ???]
> Core Sound High End Binaurals [USD 900 ???]
>
> Any plusses or minuses for each that I should note? My criteria here woul=
d
> be:
>
> 1) Sensitivity
> 2) Self-noise
> 3) Vulnerability to wind/movement/handling noise
> 4) Stereo image
> 5) Field ruggedness
> 6) Capable of running on Phantom Power?
>
> thanks+best!
> d.
>
> PS...does anyone have a working email for Sonic Studios?
> "" returns a "user unknown".
>
> --
> derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
> ---Oblique Strategy # 165:
> "Use an old idea"
>
>
>
> "Microphones are not ears,
> Loudspeakers are not birds,
> A listening room is not nature."
> Klas Strandberg
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|