Subject: | Re: new recorder - mic pre factors |
---|---|
From: | "Nick Roast" <> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:18:34 -0000 |
Rob, Could it be that you have discovered an MD with particularly good=20 mic preamps or do you feel this will be characteristic of all domestic recorders ? Nick Roast.=20 --- In Rob Danielson <> wrote: > No doubt people who can afford 722's and Lunatecs will tend to hear > the improvement in quality they're dollars are paying for.Some will > recall that I defended the pre in my 744T over every challenger-- > then I made and took some blind tests comparing it to the MP2 and > Walt, Dan and I concluded, that once the gear gets to a high level of > performance its pretty hard to discern. The recent tests I did > comparing the 722 and the lowly NH-900 HiMD's internal mic pre seems > to even question this conclusion........... ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: The Cheap and Easy Way--as in really cheap and really easy, Aaron Ximm |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: soundscape protection, Gianni Pavan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: new recorder - mic pre factors, Klas Strandberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: new recorder - mic pre factors, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU