[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 722 vs [was] NT1-A and moisture

Subject: Re: 722 vs [was] NT1-A and moisture
From: Dan Dugan <>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:27:51 -0700
Rob Danielson wrote re NT1-A:

>issue for me for ambience has been getting even
>tonal spread because they are basically treble
>centered (like all cardioids and to some extent,
>all mics). The best I've found so far is X-Y
>spaced 12" at an angle of ~60 degrees. Rode says
>90 tp 110 degrees but I haven't been able to
>avoid a volume drop or too much treble loss in
>the middle that wide.

Maybe this is a manifestation of having a large diaphragm. Large
diaphragms narrow the pattern at higher frequencies.

-Dan Dugan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU