Subject: | 722 vs [was] NT1-A and moisture |
---|---|
From: | Walter Knapp <> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:23:53 -0400 |
From: Rob Danielson <> > The new, NT2-A is variable polar pattern (cardioid, fig 8 and omni) > and seems to be based on the same electronics as the NT1-A. I believe these mics are using a op-amp chip instead of a FET transistor. I'm not sure what the issues are with that. The mic to compare the variable pattern NT2-A to would be the MKH-80, or if it's got extended frequency range (up to 50khz) then the MKH-800. They still are a different design, but that's the closest. Those two mics have omni, wide-cardioid, cardioid, and figure-8. I use a pair of MKH-80's in M/S, and like the results better than the MKH-30/40 M/S. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Comparing audiospectrograms, Xavier Eekhout |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 722 vs [was] NT1-A and moisture, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | RE: 722 vs [was] NT1-A and moisture, Martyn Stewart |
Next by Thread: | 722 vs [was] NT1-A and moisture, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU