naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: 722 vs PMD670

Subject: RE: Re: 722 vs PMD670
From: Klas Strandberg <>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:07:47 +0200
A good enough mic preamp IC for Marantz would be about a dollar and a half 
instead of 80c... or so...
I don't understand either.

Klas.

At 00:55 2005-06-21, you wrote:
>You would think for $125, Marantz would just update their pre-amps. I mean
>Oade brothers would be making a profit, it would cost Marantz how much to be
>good pre-amps into their machines?
>
>It makes no sense to me.....
>
>Martyn
>
>Martyn Stewart
>Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
>http://www.naturesound.org
>
>N47.65543   W121.98428
>Redmond. Washington. USA
>Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
>
>425-898-0462
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: 
> On Behalf Of Klas Strandberg
>Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 3:41 PM
>To: 
>Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: 722 vs PMD670
>
>Nevertheless, it is no problem today to make good preamps, so I still can't
>understand why Marantz didn't do it. On the other hand I still think we
>have a "mystery" here: Even if the PMD preamp is noisy, is shouldn't be
>THAT noisy.
>
>Klas.
>
>At 18:12 2005-06-20, you wrote:
> >Tim Nielsen wrote:
> > > ...[Klas] can't fix Marantz problem...
> >
> >Maybe not, but Doug Oade does.  If you buy your Marantz PMD660, PMD670
> >or PMD671 from Oade, he will rebuild the preamp using quality
> >components for an extra $125.  The result is *much* reduced mic preamp
> >noise.
> >
> >When Marantz designed the PMD series, their target audience was court
> >reporters, speech therapists, and stenographers -- all settings where
> >close mic placement is the rule.  I don't think that they were much
> >concerned about capturing the song of some sparrow 50 feet away.  But
> >these recorders, unmodified, do produce decent recordings if you keep
> >the mic preamp gain at a low setting.
> >
> >A colleague in Venezuela uses the unmodified PMD670 with a Telinga mic
> >and parabola, and has captured lots of high quality bird
> >vocalizations.  He prefers the PMD670 to his HHB Portadisc, even
> >though the Portadisc has a quieter preamp, because the PMD670 is
> >smaller, lighter, and, with no moving parts, more rugged in field use.
> >It's just the ticket for those all-day slogs through the forest.  I
> >think he'll like the Oade-modified PMD660 I just ordered even more.
> >
> >--oryoki
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Microphones are not ears,
> >Loudspeakers are not birds,
> >A listening room is not nature."
> >Klas Strandberg
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
>S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
>Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
>email: 
>         
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
         




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU