naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: 722 vs PMD670

Subject: RE: Re: 722 vs PMD670
From: "Martyn Stewart" <>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:37:14 -0700
In places were I have just been to, Alaska and Big Bend Texas, I took
readings quieter than I have done for years, 10-20db and recorded with 2 x
mkh-20's and my 722, I can not hear any noise from the mics or the pre-amp
even when I jack up the gain.

I know if I take the MKH,s to places like Belize or Costa Rica, I am never
going to worry about performance in 100% humid environments either. So as
far as cost goes, what price do you put on reliability?

Martyn

Martyn Stewart
Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org

N47.65543   W121.98428
Redmond. Washington. USA
Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!

425-898-0462

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Rich Peet
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:19 PM
To: 
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: 722 vs PMD670

I can not speak to the reliability or humidity or temp response of
Rhode mic. But for signal to noise it beats the mkh line.

I had never heard a system where I set the headphone level at the
actual outdoor level in a very quiet place and hear no mic noise at
all.  Then kick up the volume more and have the mics still hold
together.

I like the mkh line but with them taking the gold out I really am not
sure that we are still getting what we pay for.

Rich

--- In  "Martyn Stewart"
<> wrote:
> <<<<Now we as a group have to talk Rhode into an Omni version of
the NT-1a
> as it clearly is outperforming the mkh line at a lot less
money.>>>>>>>>
>
>
> Talk to them all you like but I can not see that it outperforms the
MKH
> line?
> Give me the MKH mics any day for performance and reliability over
most mics
> but if you are talking price you get what you pay for...
> I would take a Sennheiser anywhere and know it will perform from
humidity to
> dry deserts.....
>
> Martyn
>
> Martyn Stewart
> Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
> http://www.naturesound.org
>
> N47.65543   W121.98428
> Redmond. Washington. USA
> Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
>
> 425-898-0462
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
>  On Behalf Of Rich Peet
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 6:59 PM
> To: 
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: 722 vs PMD670
>
> Having heard the results of Robs current field setup compared to
mine.
>  Well, I ran home and went to work for more than a week trying to
> catch up.
>
> Now we as a group have to talk Rhode into an Omni version of the NT-
1a
> as it clearly is outperforming the mkh line at a lot less money.
>
> And the 744? Well, it is clearly outperforming at a lot more money.
> Rich
>
> --- In  Rob Danielson <>
wrote:
> ...
>  I've resorted to judging performance in terms of
> > specific combinations of mics and pres. Some combinations work
better
> > than one might expect, others much worse than the specs predict.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Microphones are not ears,
> Loudspeakers are not birds,
> A listening room is not nature."
> Klas Strandberg
> Yahoo! Groups Links




"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links










________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU