Subject: | Re: Edirol R-4 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:25:08 -0800 |
> > I compared the R-1 preamps to my Sharp MD-MT90's, and they were >very similar. >> > > -Dan > >Did you by chance compare them with their record gains set high-- like they >would be in a quiet location? For example, I run the 183's at "23-25" on my >mt-90 when recording in quiet locations. I crank the NT-4 to "28." Rob D. I set the Sharp MD-MT90 at 17, my standard nature recording level. I matched the Edirol's level to it, though not necessarily the gain (phones level was in the picture, too). The Edirol's meter is lousy, and the record gain control is a little thumbwheel. You'd have to paint colored dots on it or something to achieve repeatability. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Edirol R-4, Volker Widmann |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Edirol R-4, Volker Widmann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Edirol R-4, Volker Widmann |
Next by Thread: | Re: Edirol R-4, Volker Widmann |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU