naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Edirol R-4

Subject: Re: Edirol R-4
From: Klas Strandberg <>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:21:46 +0100
At 00:45 2005-03-25, you wrote:

>It would be great if they could specify what they mean by not so great?

I agree! Again: ALL mic inputs today are good enough if you use high output 
microphones!! Most microphones today are such high output mic's! What is 
the problem??

Klas.


>I actually purchased an Edirol R4 recently.
>It was the Oade page that made me aware it existed.
>According to my dealer I am one of only few people to have one in Germany.
>
>My main interest in bying it is to make the switch away from DAT as well 
>as the 4 channel opportunity.
>
>My (couple of days) experience so far is quite positve.
>
>I've done 4 channel early spring birdsong recordings with a modified 4 
>channel Jecklin disc (2 Audio Technica AT3031, 2 Audio Technica AT3032), 
>that I like very much.
>With my mid class surround system, I feel in the middle of the forest.
>
>Coming from Sony DAT and Sharp MD mic preamps, I am satisfied, but I am by 
>no means short of a recording professional.
>My main interest in recording is ambience anyway.
>Just today I did a recording of the first spring Thunderstorm from my 
>balcony with a stereo Jecklin setup (AT3032 again).
>And I really rocks.
>
>In case there is anyone who would like to have more detail about the 
>Edirol R-4 or even sound samples, just let me know.
>I would also be interested in an exchange of experience with other users.
>
>
>Volker
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU