Subject: | Re: Basic Electricity |
---|---|
From: | "Rich Peet" <> |
Date: | Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:11:33 -0000 |
I have read the stuff they wrote, but for the configuration of inner wires to matter that means that the shield already has failed and what you needed was a better shield. And so, I don't buy into their sales stuff on reverse twisting. The big reason why the star quad cable is worth the extra money is how flexible it is in cold temps. For field use outside in the cold I know of no better. I like the low profile. Rich --- In Henry Howard <> wrote: > Here's more info on the star quad cable if you want to read: > > http://www.gotham.ch/gacdeutsch/gacnews.htm > > http://www.canare.com.hk/star_quad_mic_cables.htm > > http://www.gepco.com/products/cable/microphone/quadstar.htm ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Basic Electricity, Henry Howard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Recording Mexico, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Basic Electricity, Henry Howard |
Next by Thread: | Re: Basic Electricity, Mike Feldman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU