| Subject: | Re: Only a question |
|---|---|
| From: | Walter Knapp <> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:52:23 -0400 |
From: Charles Bragg <> > If we accept that ATRAC does not deliver a perfect copy of a natural soun= d, and I do, what does that mean? To make it correct: "If we accept that sound recording with any recorder does not deliver a perfect copy of a natural sound..." That's what I know to be absolutely true. I'm certain most of the experienced recordists here know that. Let's not get into thinking ATRAC is unique in this. It is misleading the way you say it. Now go on with what it means. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: False ATRAC / MP3 artifacts... (was ATRAC / MP3 artifacts...), Walter Knapp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Only a question, Walter Knapp |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Only a question, Wil Hershberger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Only a question, Walter Knapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU