naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Digital Distortion

Subject: Re: Digital Distortion
From: Dan Dugan <>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:04:11 -0700
DAN:
>  > I have an opinion on that: never normalize. Never. No need for it. At
>>  the last stage of CD mastering, overall levels might be raised so the
>>  loudest sounds are close to max or limited close to max, but that's
>>  as far as you want to go. In intermediate steps, you need headroom
>  > for processing.

JOHN V. MOORE:
>What about normalizing to 50%. I do this on all my recordings before I sta=
rt
>to edit?. Am I making a mistake? I use CoolEdit.

I wouldn't say it was a mistake, but I sure wouldn't do that. Why
make soft and loud things the same volume?

My way of using the huge dynamic range of digital is to try to stick
with a standard recording level for almost everything. When I edit
cuts together, they come out with the natural level differences. Of
course when I make a CD, I may mix everything up to get a better
overall level, and I may raise quieter parts so they can be heard on
smaller sound systems. But that's the final stage, not the first
thing.

-Dan Dugan


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU