On most any recording I value, you could look at my riff file or its
mp3 equivelent within the audio file and get the specific info about
my recording. But this recording was made with an unfinished
microphone that was being field tested and that was not yet up to
quality. The problems, that I am still working on, are not seen at
Wren frequencies so no disclaimer was needed either. Therefore, no
riff info and this is just considered to be a for fun recording.=20
When I have another configuration to brag about, rest assured that I
will.
Rich Peet
MN
--- In tony baylis
<> wrote:
> Some times I find that this site can be obbsessed by
> technical matters and then at times......... I
> enjoyed the nitewren but miss the basic tech info
> about a recording eg. mic used, recorder, parabolic,
> long lead etc.
> Tony Baylis.
> --- Rich Peet <> wrote:
> > >
> > > One of my comments I got about my survey
> > recordings was how I was
> > > getting rare recordings of birds, because the bird
> > people quit at
> > > sunset. The distribution of night calling birds is
> > much less well
> > known
> > > than daytime callers. I don't specifically record
> > birds, though I'm
> > > doing a little more since finding that out.
> > >
> > > Walt
> > >
> >
> > Some of us are paying attention to the nite.
> > Attached are Marsh Wrens in Central MN recorded at
> > 2:00 A.M.
> > There is a period for these little energy bundles
> > when they don't
> > appear to ever slow down.
> >
> > 334kb download at:
> > http://home.attbi.com/~richpeet/nitewren.mp3
> >
> > Rich Peet
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|