Subject: | Re: Digital Distortion |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Sun, 29 Jun 2003 11:58:01 -0700 |
Evert, you wrote, >John: >Normalizing to 50% before you start to edit a file doesn't make much >sense to me. If for instance the peak level is - 10 dB and the >average value is -20 dB, and you are gonna normalize to 50 %, you >will lower the level that much, that you are gonna loose enough bits >to code the signal. I don't have this software, but my assumption on reading "normalize to 50%" was that the function shifts the gain up or down so that the peak is -6 dBFS, i.e. 50% modulation. If the peak level is -10 dBFS, it would raise it 4 dB. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Digital Distortion, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Digital Distortion, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Digital Distortion, Klas Strandberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: Digital Distortion, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU