Rich,
I have to say, the first of the three samples on your post was one of
the most interesting samples I've heard so far in this group(sorry
just getting around to listening). I would be interested in hearing
the entire programe. What recorder did you use?
Bob
--- In "Rich Peet" <>
wrote:
> We have had a few posts in the past that mention wide spaced Omni's.
> I thought I would post a couple examples from yesterday for those
> that wonder what that does.
> As you can see I posted types of sounds not the ideal pretty
> recordings.
> You decide for yourself if it has value as it is a bit different.
>
> Technique here was two ME-62's spaced at 50 feet
>
> First example: Planes, Cranes, and a loon, 260kb download
> This is the what happens when a loud sound is almost directly off
to
> a side and the stereo image starts to get lost.
> With a very loud signal completely on a side I am likely going to
> choose my best channel and use only it.
> But at least I had more land covered by having the wide spaced mics.
> http://home.attbi.com/~richpeet/wide.mp3
>
>
> Second example: The wind with the warbler, 400kb download
> Note that this wind gusting over 20mph sounds loud and strong but
> appears to move slowly.
> http://home.attbi.com/~richpeet/wide2.mp3
>
> Third example: The quiet river a 350kb download
> Quiet sounds coming from all directions.
> The mind seems to "fix" the effect and solves the problem. Maybe
for
> you by placing you in a small valley or maybe standing a distance
> from a large wall.
> http://home.attbi.com/~richpeet/wide3.mp3
>
> Just another technique that you can keep in mind. Now you can
decide
> if I should have used 100' spacing or maybe 200'.
>
> Rich Peet
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|