naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

ATRAC don't get no respect

Subject: ATRAC don't get no respect
From: "oryoki2000" <>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 01:22:21 -0000
ATRAC technology was developed
to save disc storage and reduce 
bandwidth during data transmission,
while maintaining a high degree of
fidelity to the original source.  
ATRAC does a fine job meeting 
these criteria.

In some quarters, however, ATRAC will 
always be the Rodney Dangerfield of 
recording technologies:
"I tell ya, I don't get no respect."

This is because ATRAC will always be
criticized for creating, by design,
an approximation of the original source.
Saying the result is "indistinguishable
from the original" doesn't change the
fact that 80% of the original digital
material is discarded, and other data
added, when creating the ATRAC version. 

Some recordists will always prefer to 
work from the original digital material, 
rather than an approximation.  When disc
space is at a premium, these recordists
choose to use "lossless" compression.
The new DEVA recorders employ this approach,
for example.

ATRAC has proven to be an excellent and 
widely respected tool for recording.  
But it will always be criticized. Whether 
this matters or not is really the choice 
of the recordist.  

--Oryoki



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU