Look, he is trying for a learning CD. I do not have the greatest equipmen=
t
(stuck with tape because of Cornells great advice) and my recordings are
not the greatest but often it is the background outdoor NATURAL noise that
is far more than any tape hiss etc. The goal here is to get something out
for people to learn to identify the critters from. I record a lot in areas
with aspen. I am not sure those trees even need a slight breeze to make
noise - I am totally convinced that the leaves rustle when it is dead still
8~) and if the leaves are not making the noise your recordings sound like
they were made in the rain (tent catipiller outbreaks) Actually I prefer
recordings that have not been overly processed making the recording "sound"
great but the bird not sound natural - particularly when high frequency
stuff is removed. On the prairies you have the wind factor except
(sometimes) for a short time in the early morning. Our boreal forest has a
very high number of breeding birds and everything happens at once. My
biggest prolem is somewhat isolating the bird. Often removing other specie=
s
really ruins the recording.
Get out there, record the dialects in your area. Get a convenient sound
editor and go from there.
If you need some recordings let me know. I am probably missing some you
have. I am working on a 3 cd learning set Alberta Birding by Ear here and
missing a few I really want to have on the set.
Barb Beck
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Deenen (home)
Sent: April 18, 2003 10:37 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] taking the leap
So what do you use to get into the mac ? If it=B9s indeed the analog input
like you=B9re describing, good luck getting that =B3grain=B2 out. It=B9s p=
retty
bad, really. General rule in the post world to not try to add more noise i=
f
you=B9re trying to get rid of noise. Makes the job that much harder :) But=
I
see where you=B9re coming from in case this is just for home use etc.
-cd
> From: Walter Knapp <>
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:29:31 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] taking the leap
>
>
> Charles Deenen (home) wrote:
>> >
>> > You might want to see if you have a friend or relative that has
Protools
>> > with Nonoise or the Waves Restoration bundle. Excessive tape hiss and
noise
>> > is not easy to =B3filter=B2. Substractive filtering is needed most li=
kely
in
>> > those cases.
>> >
>> > Heck, if they are good recordings, you can probably find plenty of
people
>> > that are willing to do this for you in trade of the sounds on those
tapes.
>
> But, once committed to this path, and assuming that you will be making
> new recordings it's time to build up a software kit of your own. A Ok
> option if no more nature recording is contemplated. But if this is
> ongoing, set up to handle it.
>
> Particularly as self publishing a cd is a goal it's going to be
> necessary to set up with some reasonable software. The start can be done
> with inexpensive stuff, but if a quality cd is to be produced, you are
> into having something that has good filters and editing. Or has the
> ability to use standard plugins. Preferably both. And if mixing in
> narration even more complication is involved.
>
> I use two pieces of software for my work. I use Peak as my standard
> editor, for bringing the sound in, cut and paste editing, minor gain
> adjusts and so on. For heavy filtering I use Spark XL. Peak has been
> responding to the capabilities of Spark XL for filtering, and has a new
> version out (version 4) that appears to have some at least of what Spark
> XL gives me. I don't know if it has integrated a sonogram display into
> the filtering yet, have not had time to investigate. Been putting it off
> until I have OSX running on my machine.
>
> I burn audio cds with Roxio's Jam. This has abilities not found so far
> in Peak or in Roxio's Toast. Like, for instance the crossfades that are
> in the frog cd once DNR releases that. Or at least last I heard they
> were in it. Those were done without modifying the source files. As was
> the final gain adjust to make them all work together.
>
>> > Ps: don=B9t forget the A-D stage as well. It=B9s an important factor.
>
> Assuming it's a mac with sound input, that's not too big a problem. The
> standard analog sound input of macs is CD quality. Plenty good enough
> for cassette. If it happens to be one of the newer macs that they left
> the sound input off, then a USB device is the way to go. A number are
> available.
>
> Walt
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|