naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Denecke AD20 vs SoundDevices MP2 (not a review)

Subject: Re: Denecke AD20 vs SoundDevices MP2 (not a review)
From: "Rich Peet <>" <>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:53:24 -0000
You probably won't like my oppionion much but that has not slowed it
much in the past.

>From a guy with a MZ-R55.
I would not use either of these preamps with it.
You simply will not gain enough and it is not money well spent.

I differ from Walt a bit as I don't care for field filtering much,
don't have a complaint with the MZ-R55 a/d converter, and only minor
complaints about the preamp. The lack of metering is a problem and
covered only by listening while recording with this unit.=20

I want to come home with everything that I can and if filtering is to
be done it should occur in the computer while editing. I don't see
problems with the MZ-R55 a/d converters and the problems with the
preamp should not be fixed with a second stage more expensive than
the recorder.=20

But then in general I see stereo preamps as two chip circuits in
todays world and one can build a very good one for under $25.00. But
please don't ask me to prove it right now as the plate is a bit full
and sound is just lifes candy to me.

Rich Peet

--- In  "evertveldhuis
<>" <> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was surfing the internet (google-ing all the way), and was
> wondering about something; currently my setup is a consumer
portable
> minidiscrecorder, the Sony MZ-R55.
> I try to have the best signalpath available, therefor I would like
to
> skip the internal preamp of the Sony.
>
> What I do not - and most likely never will - use is plug-in-power /
> phantom power delivered by the recorder.
> What I don't want to do (yet) is buy a pro machine like the
Portadisc.
>
> In my search for suitable preamps two machines stuck in my mind;
> 1 - the SoundDevices MP2
> (http://www.sounddevices.com/products/mp2master.htm)
> Price is about 625 US dollars. (at micsupply dot com)
> It does have options that I currently do not want; phantompower, MS-
> decoding. However, it's 'Unclippable' inputs and low freq filters
are
> probably very usefull to me.
>
> 2 - the Denecke AD20
> (http://www.core-sound.com/inbox.html) this URL gives the most info
> on this machine, official site: (http://www.denecke.com/prod04.htm)
> Price is about 310 US dollars.
> It has a built in AD converter that can be connected to both the
> coaxial and optical output. I would be using it's optical output
> connected to the optical input of the MZ-R55.
> It has only 2 controls; left and right volume, no metering.
>
> Which to buy?
> I would like to know if anyone can give me advice on how the
preamps
> sound; do they color, is the self-noise audible at 'normal' gain
> settings?
> IF the AD20 would be comparable, soundwise, to the MP2. Then the
AD20
> would have some major advantages; lower price, digital out, less
> settings to worry about.
>
> So my big question is; how good is the AD20 compared to the MP2.
>
> Regards, Evert



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU