birding-aus
|
To: | Peter Shute <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re Banding trip to Buddigower Nature Reserve take 2 |
From: | Ian May <> |
Date: | Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:31:24 +1100 |
Thanks Peter. The line should read "5 attachments including two bands" Peter Shute wrote: Is there any chance we could see the photo of the wader with five flags, Ian? What species was it? Can anyone tell me what the allowable limit is? Peter Shute Sent from my iPhoneOn 17 Oct 2014, at 5:03 pm, "Ian May" <> wrote: We are in full agreement about habitat protection however, no matter which way I look at it, I just cannot see how banding helps to save any bird. As a friend pointed out to me recently, comparing the impacts of call playback and bird photography with the adverse impacts of bird banding, canon netting, mist netting and leg flagging etc. is like comparing being hit with a feather duster compared to a speeding Mack truck. Recently I observed a photograph of a small wader with 5 flags and two bands. I have seen Curlew Sandpiper with 4 flags. There is a photograph circulating of flagged and banded Spoon-billed Sandpiper chicks. It might be nice to know everywhere they go but surely such an endangered small migratory bird should be protected to migrate unimpeded.. How can banding a Spoon-billed Sandpiper chick help save them. More likely, these birds are doomed because of their handling and banding. Many small waders populations are in decline. I remember when repeatable counts indicated most small wader populations were stable. Red Knots and Curlew Sandpiper were widespread and common. While obviously there are habitat protection issues too, dropping numbers of these species closely correlate with the period when canon netting and leg flagging commenced and the declining numbers correlate too. Just a coincidence? I don't think so. A high percentage (not a small percentage as we have been asked to remember) of the Sanderling population in Southern Australia have been leg flagged and their declining numbers also correlate closely with numbers flagged. 12 months after flagging, retrap rates are minuscule and the lost birds cannot be logically explained. Ian May St Helens Tasmania ------------------------------------------------------------------------ g and Val Clancy wrote:Hi all, I have been banding birds since 1971 and as suggested I do think carefully about the pros and cons of this activity. I get sad when I see people suggesting that we know all that we need to know from banding when that is patently not the case. We have only scratched the surface when it comes to our understanding of Australia's birds and their movements. I am glad that people are compassionate enough to be concerned about the birds' welfare as this is paramount in my thoughts as well but please direct your concerns where they really need to be directed - at the people clearing natural ecosystems, at people shooting ducks for sport, at people who have cats and dogs that are allowed to roam and kill our wildlife etc.. I know that some people have witnessed accidents during banding activities and this has coloured their view for life but the rare case where a bird suffers from banding should not mean that it is not a legitimate and humane activity. I hold an animal care and ethics approval for my banding and I am held accountable for any losses. People who do not like birds being banded are entitled to their opinion but, like Martin, please find out all you can about the positives before condemning the people who are giving large amounts of their own time and money to research the birds so that they can be saved. The winter movement of birds such as Grey Fantails, Golden Whistlers, Striated Pardalotes and other species from Tasmania and southern Australia to the north coast of New South Wales and southern Queensland is only now being recognised. We need more banders to track these movements not less banding. Remember banders will only ever band a small percentage of the population of any species but that percentage can provide essential data that cannot be gathered by observation alone. It was banding that proved that the formerly recognised two species of Silvereye in south-eastern Australia were in fact the one species but one type was of Tasmanian origin and the other of local origin. My banding research on the Eastern Osprey, Black-necked Stork, Beach Stone-curlew and Australian Pied Oystercatcher and others has provided essential data required for the management of these threatened species. Banding is not the problem it is an important part of the solution. Regards Greg Dr Greg. P. Clancy Ecologist and Birding-wildlife Guide | PO Box 63 Coutts Crossing NSW 2460 | 02 6649 3153 | 0429 601 960 http://www.gregclancyecologistguide.com http://gregswildliferamblings.blogspot.com.au/ -----Original Message----- From: martin cachard Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:06 PM To: Dr Mark Carey ; geoff jones barra images ; Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Re Banding trip to Buddigower Nature Reserve take 2 this is a very interesting thread & I've learnt so much already just from a couple of posts, so thank you so far for these insights into banding. one species I believe which could reveal some interesting findings could be the local breeding canescens race of Black-winged Monarch, a species I've been doing much fieldwork on in recent years... one perplexing question for me is where do they winter when not in Australia?? of course some banding would also need to be done in PNG or wherever else we believe this race may winter... I truly wonder??? any ideas on doing such a project anyone?? cheers, martin cachard, cairnsFrom: To: ; Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:28:39 +1100 Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Re Banding trip to Buddigower Nature Reserve take 2 Hi all, A good article that explains quite nicely why we should continue banding and why banding schemes are important! http://www.britishbirds.co.uk/article/bird-ringing-still-necessary/ Cheers, MarkFrom: To: Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:50:22 +1100 Subject: [Birding-Aus] Re Banding trip to Buddigower Nature Reservetake > 2In response to Harveys reply I need to apologise to Harvey aboutleaving > thenets unattended as he has now said that the nets were not openedbefore > theywent off and set up camp and I have already sent a personal emailto > Harveyon that subject. But if you had read Harvey's Blog here is anexcerpt > fromit; " When we arrived at Buddigower, Karen and I set to to get afew > netsup before dusk, in the same area we had banded those four years >previously,then went about the business of setting up camp" This quote is howI > cameto that conclusion, however it still does not change my point ofview > aboutbanding birds in a local areas, again I ask for what purpose is itdone?My personal thoughts are that a bird count done regularly by alocal > birdclub will give you a considerable amount of information withoutputting > thebirds thru the trauma of being banded. Last Saturday afternoon I >personallyobserved Sharp-tailed Sandpipers that had recently arrived and were vigorously feeding after their annual migration to our shores. Theywerefeeding in one of the ponds near the Burrow Pits at the Western >TreatmentPlant and as they struggled to raise their legs in the soft mud I >couldn'thelp but think that if they had large leg flags on their feet andthat > ifbirds of prey were around, which is quite common at this site, itcould > bethe difference between life and death for those birds. Most people now know that the population of waders are dramatically dropping as many local groups throughout Australian do numerous wader countsand > thatinformation is passed on to the appropriate people and/ororganizations.So why should we continue to Net, Traumatize and in some cases killor > maimbirds, all for so-called research? I for one think not! Kindest Regards Geoff Jones Barra Imaging --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast!Antivirus > protection is active.http://www.avast.com <HR> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list <BR> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit: <BR>http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org</HR><HR> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list <BR> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit: <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org </HR><HR> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list <BR> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit: <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org </HR> <HR> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list <BR> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit: <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org </HR><HR> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list <BR> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit: <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org </HR> <HR> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list <BR> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit: <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org </HR> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Bronzewing Diary 2014, Philip Veerman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [no subject], Laurie Knight |
Previous by Thread: | Re Banding trip to Buddigower Nature Reserve take 2, Peter Shute |
Next by Thread: | Re Banding trip to Buddigower Nature Reserve take 2, Stephen Ambrose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU