Taxonomy should be irrelevant to rare bird committees. I have been member of a
number of rare bird committees around the globe, in which we did include
vagrant taxa not generally accepted as species - such as nigricans Brant in
Germany, but also in New Jersey.
Therefore irrespective of the taxonomy, BARC should not be irrelevant to
albatrosses.
Cheers,
Nikolas
----------------
Nikolas Haass
Sydney, NSW
________________________________
From: Henry Battam <>
To: John Graff <>; "" <>;
"" <>; Birding-Aus
<>
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Which Wandering Albatross?
unlike many terrestrial species, albatrosses and other petrels will always be a
taxonomic problem. The formal dogmatic definition of a species is intended to
put creatures into boxes where they can be uniquely classified for human
convenience. The Procellariiformes just will not adopt this philosophy. Nature
is not at our convenience and regardless BARC will remain irrelevant to
albatrosses.
Cheers
Harry Battam
BE, PhD
Institute for Conservation and Environmental Management
University of Wollongong
Wollongong, NSW, Australia 2522
Mobile +61 429 887 883
________________________________
From: John Graff
Sent: 04 April 2012 12:39
To: Henry Battam; ; ; Birding-Aus
Subject: Which Wandering Albatross?
I believe BARC has recently adopted the IOC taxonomy, and so Tristan Albatross
records would be considered now (there are several Chatham Albatross and
Atlantic Yellow-nosed Albatross records now listed as under review). But that's
only a recent thing
John
> From:
> To: ; ; ;
>
> Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Which Wandering Albatross?
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 01:30:20 +0000
>
> So true for ID. Note that BARC is irrelevant to albatrosses.
>
> Cheers
>
> Harry Battam
> BE, PhD
> Institute for Conservation and Environmental Management
> University of Wollongong
> Wollongong, NSW, Australia 2522
> Mobile +61 429 887 883
>
> ________________________________________
> From:
> on behalf of Nikolas Haass
>
> Sent: 04 April 2012 09:40
> To: Ashwin Rudder; John Graff; birding-aus
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Which Wandering Albatross?
>
> To my knowledge it is also very difficult to ID Tristan in the hand. I have
> personally seen two interesting candidates (both caught and measured by
> SOSSA), but we did not get to a definite ID. As far as I know there is not a
> single record of a Tristan Albatross
accepted by BARC. Correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nikolas
>
>
> ----------------
> Nikolas Haass
>
> Sydney, NSW
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ashwin Rudder <>
> To: John Graff <>; birding-aus <>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 10:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Which Wandering Albatross?
>
> Thanks John and Henry for the replies about the occurrence of Tristan's
> Albatross in Aus waters. It seems that the difficulty in ID-ing them makes
> them not really worth considering unless you can get them in the hand.
>
> Cheers,
> Ashwin
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:24 PM, John Graff <> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ashwin,
> >
> > I think Tristan is pretty rarely recorded with certainty in Australian
> > waters, but the ID difficulties make it difficult to know for certain. It's
> > interesting to note though that satellite tracking data shows
> > that non-breeders do reach the south coast of WA - see the Tristan
> > Albatross factsheet at ACAP http://www.acap.aq/acap-species
> >
> > John
> > > Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:24:43 +1100
> > > From:
> > > To:
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Which Wandering Albatross?
> > >
> > > Thanks to all those that have replied :)
> > >
> > > The general consensus was that these birds (both in general, and the two
> > I
> > > asked about) are incredibly difficult to identify with certainty. Those
> > who
> > > replied were fairly happy to call the first bird a Gibson's, while the
> > > second attracted a fairly even split between exulans and gibsoni.
> > >
> > > I originally dismissed Tristan's (dabbenena) straight out on the basis of
> > > distribution, however a few people made reference to them. How often are
> > > they recorded in Australia's waters?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ashwin
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Henry Battam <>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ashwin
> > > >
> > > > Individual 1 has brown plumage and a definite forehead. It is most
> > likely
> > > > D. gibsoni, but could be (less likely) D. dabbenena.
> > > > Individual 2 has 3 generations of plumage. However the youngest
> > > > generation is slate-coloured, and this bird has no distinct forehead,
> > > > characteristics of D. exulans
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Harry Battam
> > > > Institute for Conservation and Environmental Management
> > > > University of Wollongong
> > > > Wollongong, NSW, Australia 2522
> > > > Mobile +61 429 887 883
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > From: [
> > > > on behalf of Ashwin Rudder [
> > > >
> > > > Sent: 27 March 2012 21:05
> > > > To: birding-aus
> > > > Subject: [Birding-Aus] Which Wandering Albatross?
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like a hand identifying these two Wandering Albatross to species
> > (or
> > > > subspecies depending on your taxonomy beliefs) level, if it's
> > possible. At
> > > > the moment I'm struggling to split between gibsoni and exulans, and
> > thought
> > > > I'd throw the pics out to some experts to get some more opinions. I
> > have
> > > > more photos/bigger crops of both individuals.
> > > >
> > > > The photos were taken mid January 2012, off Lord Howe Island.
> > > > Images 1-3 show the first bird
> > > > Images 4 and 5 show the second bird, which I neglected to get good
> > shots
> > > > of...
> > > > Images 6 and 7 show both birds, with the first bird on the
> > right-hand-side
> > > > in both pics.
> > > > (This information is included in the captions)
> > > >
> > > > The images can be viewed here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://picasaweb.google.com/noisypitta/Albatross?authuser=0&feat=directlink
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts would be appreciated :)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Ashwin
> > > > ===============================
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > > > send the message:
> > > > unsubscribe
> > > > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > > > to:
> > > >
> > > > http://birding-aus.org
> > > > ===============================
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ===============================
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > > send the message:
> > > unsubscribe
> > > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > > to:
> > >
> > > http://birding-aus.org
> > > ===============================
> >
> ===============================
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
>
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
> ===============================
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
>
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
>
>
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
|
