Peacock coutship

To:	birding-aus <>
Subject:	Peacock coutship
From:	Nathan <>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:54:34 +1100

I was listening to an ol podcast of Dr Karl yesterday and he said that
the female peafowl decided whether to cout a male before she even sees
the males tail and that the tail was an 'Evolutionary Accident' I
don't doubt this as fact but I am wondering how on earth you would
test that?

~Thanks
~Nathan Ruser
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Peacock coutship, Nathan <= Peacock coutship, Syd Curtis Peacock coutship, Philip Veerman Peacock coutship, Peter Shute Peacock coutship, John Tongue Peacock courtship, Alan Gillanders Peacock courtship, Stephen Ambrose Peacock courtship, Paul Taylor Peacock courtship, brian fleming Re: Re: [Birding-Aus] Peacock courtship, calyptorhynchus Re: Re: [Birding-Aus] Peacock courtship, Chris Sanderson

Previous by Date:	Two Cockies, Roaminoz -
Next by Date:	NSW Scientific Committee Determinations, Carl Clifford
Previous by Thread:	Bird studies cards - Tuckfields Kinkara Tea and Copper Kettle coffee, Cheryl Ridge
Next by Thread:	Peacock coutship, Syd Curtis
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU