Nathan <>, birding-aus <>
Syd Curtis <>
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:55:37 +1000
I have not heard Dr Karl on the subject, but it seems to me to be most
unlikely that the female decides whether to court a male before she even
sees the male's tail.
She has to see a male to court him; why can't she see his tail? Does Dr
Karl reckon that until her hormones render her in the mood for courting, all
the males are invisible to her?
Richard Dawkins, who has gone into the subject of evolution rather more than
most scientists, certainly doesn't agree with what you quote from Dr Karl.
The Peahens role in evolving the peacock tale is mentioned at length in his
book** "The Greatest Show on Earth - the Evidence for Evolution". I give
you just one quote to indicate the nature of Dawkins' opinion. At page 62:
"Peahens (we don't know whether consciously and deliberately, but lets
guess not) choose attractive peacocks for breeding, again preserving
** my copy in paperback; Bantam Press, 2009.
> From: Nathan <>
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:54:34 +1100
> To: birding-aus <>
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Peacock coutship
> I was listening to an old podcast of Dr Karl yesterday and he said that
> the female peafowl decided whether to court a male before she even sees
> the males tail and that the tail was an 'Evolutionary Accident' I
> don't doubt this as fact but I am wondering how on earth you would
> test that?
> ~Nathan Ruser
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: