birding-aus
|
To: | Luke Shelley <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Birding-aus a forum? |
From: | "" <> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:40:32 +0800 |
Luke, Thanks for your though provoking & the thought you have put into your post. However I would like to add my vote to the Don’t Change group. I am part of a community & not part of a website. Comments to the point you have raised are as follows: ... I find the
usability of Birding-Aus excruciatingly painful. I find it instantaneous & efficient in its email subscription mode. I think it would be
wonderful if the information that is generously shared here could be
presented in another form, such that it is easier to read and filter, yet does not
detract from the overall experience of the user. I am not sure that a forum
design is the way to go, but there are plenty of models out there now
that could be considered. What about incorporating wiki's for RFI's on
birding sites so that the same questions don't get asked repeatedly? Many, most, questions on
Birding-Aus have an answer that quickly gets out of date. For those of you that
did not like Clair's suggestion, I wonder if you made that decision based on
well-founded knowledge and experience of what works (as some of you have
demonstrated in your replies), or just purely based on resistance to change,
and what is best for you? Do you really think that a dozen or so replies
against the suggestion is an accurate representation of all of the users of
Birding-Aus? Yes, resistance to change is based on what is best for me. It is also based on my experience
with other groups I have subscribed to have changed format, undergone a clumsy transition process & at the end effectively offer me no more usefulness than I had before. I don't think it's a
question of "If it aint broke don't fix it". The website works, but
there are now better solutions available. I believe it is possible to create a
website that can be simple to use and intuitive, retain current users (and
even make them happier!), and attract more. Surely the more people who
participate and contribute, the richer our resource becomes, and the greater
benefit for all? Isn't that what we should be striving for here? I wonder what the
stats are like on this birding website et al? Are the same people logging in all
the time? What percentage of users contribute vs how many read? How many
hits are there a day? How can we translate that into what percentage of the
birding population in website? These are the
kind of things professional web developers keep an eye on all the time. Yes these are what professional
developers keep their eye on. However this site is for the birding users & ‘hits’
per se is not a relevant criteria for usefulness. When I do an archive search I may see a last century format but I get what I was looking for. On top of that,
usability testing is a key component of any successful website design. Ponder
this: What would happen if you put someone in front of a computer and
asked them to go to www.birding-aus.org and find some information on birds?
Give them something specific to look for that you know is there, but give no
hints, no help. Try it with someone who has never been on the site before and
watch what they do. Where do they click? Do they get it straight away? How
long does it take? Ask them for feedback afterwards. People with a birding interest
but little Web experience that I have introduced to the site seem to get it & use it without problems. Over the past few
months, there has been a lot of chatter about how modern technology,
particularly the internet, can be used for birding. This topic is just another facet
of the same theme that has been occurring over that time; the current
birding websites are not meeting the demands of the modern birder. There are plenty of websites more ‘modern’ than Birding-Aus. I use Birding-Aus in preference to these. BA may have a couple of hundred
regular posters. If it had several thousand then the email subscription would be useless to me. Regards, Chris Charles On Wed Jan 27 20:45 , Luke Shelley <> sent: <> Good, positive, suggestion Clair. =============================== www.birding-aus.org birding-aus.blogspot.com To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: =============================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Birding-aus a forum?, Luke Shelley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RFI CHARITY donation, Peter Shute |
Previous by Thread: | Birding-aus a forum?, Peter Shute |
Next by Thread: | Birding-aus a forum?, Luke Shelley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU