Reading the stuff at www.worldbirdnames.org, it seems the IOC prefers to make
as few changes as possible, probably for that reason.
Peter Shute
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Syd Curtis
Sent: Friday, 27 November 2009 12:43 PM
To: Birding-aus (E-mail)
Subject: Bird names
Back home after a couple of weeks in hospital to find a bewildering
accumulation of emails re bird names. Can't be sure if I've absorbed all of
them, so my apologies if I'm repeating anything that has already been said.
Marvellous animal is Homo sapiens, distinguished from all others by having a
language that can convey such detailed information ... and everything that has
flowed from that.
And surely the primary purpose of a bird name is just that: to convey
information: to enable the reader or hearer to identify the bird named.
It seems to me that it is of little consequence if an Australian communicating
to an Australian uses "Magpie" for a bird that is in no way related to northern
hemisphere "magpies", if both know what species is being talked about.
In writing, if there is likely to be any misunderstanding as to the precise
identity of a bird referred to by a vernacular name, simply add the scientific
name, and if there remains any possibility of taxonomic changes, simply quote
the source from which you took the name. Then anyone sufficiently interested
will be able to track it down.
If a word from an Aboriginal language is substituted for an existing English
word, this will confuse rather than inform and reference to the scientific name
would be essential.
Cheers
Syd
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
=============================
|
