G'day Michael,
I think you could say that this bird goes into the assessment as pre-
BARCed.
On 23/02/2008, at 6:52 PM, michael norris wrote:
Hi all
While I've occasionally gasped in astonishment at the quality of the
phenotypical analysis I am beginning to wonder if this isn't the
sort of discussion where I, as a local Councillor, would have to
duck out in case I came to a Committee (let's call it BARK) with
either a "conflict of interest" - like a personal interest in the
outcome increasing my score, or a concern about "apprehended bias" -
a belief that I have such set views that I would not be open to what
I hear in debate before casting my vote.
But I note BARC has 8 men on it - presumably this all male
collection would be replaced by proxies should any one of the 8 be
in the difficulties outlined above.
Michael Norris
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
