Hi Peter
Canon have a "Data Verification Kit" for their pro digital SLRs which
can prove that the image hasn't been altered post capture.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0401/04012903canondvke2.asp
This kit is only available to be used with the top models which are
of course more expensive. Hence the $6K.
I would have thought that just shooting RAW would be enough, but not
for some it seems.
Cheers
David Stowe
On 15/02/2007, at 6:52 PM, Peter Ewin wrote:
I am not going to comment on the bird's ID, but I was interested in
this quote.
Mr Young vehemently denied the claims. He has since bought a
special $6000 camera which takes pictures which cannot be
digitally altered in the hope of proving that the bird was real.
Is this true? I would have thought it is the format that a digital
photo is stored rather than the camera that allows alteration. And
that any photo can be scanned and then digitally altered afterwards.
Do any camera people have comments?
Cheers,
Peter
_________________________________________________________________
Join the millions of Australians using Live Search. Try live.com.au
http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?
mode=click&clientID=740&referral=million&URL=http://live.com.au
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
| 