I am not going to comment on the bird's ID, but I was interested in this
quote.
Mr Young vehemently denied the claims. He has since bought a special $6000
camera which takes pictures which cannot be digitally altered in the hope
of proving that the bird was real.
Is this true? I would have thought it is the format that a digital photo is
stored rather than the camera that allows alteration. And that any photo can
be scanned and then digitally altered afterwards.
Do any camera people have comments?
Cheers,
Peter
_________________________________________________________________
Join the millions of Australians using Live Search. Try live.com.au
http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?mode=click&clientID=740&referral=million&URL=http://live.com.au
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
