Fourth Fig Parrot

["Alistair McKeough" <>]

I think Fuji did one that was supposedly for use in evidence. Best just to
shoot transparency film though probably.

However:

+----------+
|  PLEASE  |
|  DO NOT  |
| FEED THE |
|  TROLLS  |
+----------+
    |  |
    |  |
  .\|.||/..



On 15/02/2007, Peter Ewin <> wrote:
>
> I am not going to comment on the bird's ID, but I was interested in this
> quote.
>
>
> >Mr Young vehemently denied the claims. He has since bought a
> special  $6000
> >camera which takes pictures which cannot be digitally altered  in the
> hope
> >of proving that the bird was real.
>
>
> Is this true? I would have thought it is the format that a digital photo
> is
> stored rather than the camera that allows alteration. And that any photo
> can
> be scanned and then digitally altered afterwards.
>
> Do any camera people have comments?
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the millions of Australians using Live Search. Try live.com.au
>
> http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?mode=click&clientID=740&referral=million&URL=http://live.com.au
>
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================