On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Jim Ham wrote:
> Myself I prefer Emacs, a make file and several open command line
> windows. This gives me complete control and the ultimate flexibility.
> You could do a lot worse than providing a makefile template and a video
> demonstrating a typical command-line development environment. This could
> include a man file in one window, less with an open file in another,
> Emacs in another, the results of a grep in another, etc.
>
> Sometimes one can even compile and debug in the development environment,
> saving cross-compiling until later. In this case there might even be a
> ddd window open with gdb and the new application (trying) to run in the
> background. This works best in a Unix-like environment of course.
>
> You can substitute your own favorite editor for the Emacs references above.
>
> Just the opinion of an old curmudgeon. At the same time it would be
> interesting to know how many others prefer a command-line development
> environment.
Me too! After all (s/emacs/vim/) it's the IDE that gave us the Linux kernel
:-)
cheers
Jim J.
> > --- In Mark Featherston<> wrote:
> >>
> >> As many of you know we currently provide the Eclipse IDE configured with
> >> our toolchains for the various boards. We're looking to improve how
> >> this is supported and to update the IDE package for our newer boards but
> >> we are also exploring other IDEs as an alternative. I've talked to a
> >> number of customers who seem to strongly prefer Code::Blocks or
> >> Netbeans. I'm curious to hear opinions from those who have worked with
> >> these or other relevant IDEs themselves.
> >>
> >> Here are the various IDE's I've been evaluating:
> >>
> >> *Code::Blocks*: http://www.codeblocks.org/
> >> *Netbeans*: http://netbeans.org/
> >> *Codelite*: http://www.codelite.org/
> >> *Eclipse*: http://www.eclipse.org/
> >>
> >> If anyone else has any open cross platform IDEs to recommend we'd
> >> certainly be interested in those as well. I'm currently leaning towards
> >> Code::Blocks as it seems like it would lend itself to the simplest
> >> configuration while still supporting the most features. They also seem
> >> to have a community around using the IDE with embedded systems. However
> >> if most of you prefer Eclipse there are a few improvements we can add to
> >> this package to make usage easier. Specifically I'd like to add
> >> templates for our boards rather than just sample the projects that show
> >> how to use the cross compilers.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> ________________________________________________________________
> >> Mark Featherston, Technologic Systems | voice: (480) 837-5200
> >> 16525 East Laser Drive | fax: (480) 837-5300
> >> Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 | web: www.embeddedARM.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2012.0.1834 / Virus Database: 2092/4590 - Release Date: 11/01/11
> >
> >
>
> --
> Porcine Associates LLC
> 244 O'Connor St.
> Menlo Park, CA 94025
> USA
> +1(650)326-2669 fax +1(650)326-1071
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|