--- In "Mark Carlson" <>
wrote:
>
> On 5/5/06, pickanameanditstakensoihavethis <>
wrote:
> > well the licencing has been set to gnu gpl in order to cover
the
> > software , ip cores and hardware , but the hardware may have to
> > change to a more bsd like licence as it looks like a gpl will
> > prevent manufactuers form making a profit from manufactureing
it,
> > and as without profit it would not be worth making, that will
need
> > to be checked and changed to allow it, if it is the case
>
> Quick question:
> I'm no licensing expert, but since you've already released the
> hardware as GPL, don't you have to keep it that way now?
(Derivative
> works and such) Or am I incorrect? Is there a way to release it
> under the BSD license now?
>
actualy it is more to do with the fact that the gpl licence is not
relavent to hardware it will prpbably remain gpl but a modified
version of gpl for hardware ,, i was aware that there was an attempt
to create a gpl licence for hardware a couple of years ago , but
still searching for it atm ,think nothing came of it because no one
could agree on it
the gpl licence had been used as it covers the software and ip used
so was carried on to the hardware, but interestingly the gpl
licencing only covers the documentation in printed or other form and
media that it might be stored on, but fails to cover any hardware
made from it , only the schematics and artwork in printed form , and
not the physical pcbs once made , from what i can tell atm
ie a built up unit is not what the licence has covered it only
covered the instructions on how to do it,
even if not the assembled pcb could be considered media and costs
of producing that is allowed
as the copywrite holder for the design the hardware has almost a, do
as you will make as you want build into whatever you like
licencing with it but give us credit along with the usual disclamers
to everything , but the gpl is what the default ip cores will be
using ,
the big point that i think has been causing most concern is the fact
that if the whole system is gpl it may prevent use as an embedded
product with a non gnu ip and software ie say a set top ip tv box
the licence needs to ensure that that use is posible without
affecting there ip if thay wish to keep that closed source
that is not intended and not what we will want , and afaik not what
the GPL licence will require of them
although whatever licence gets used it will only allow less
restrictions than the gpl on the hardware side that is appearing to
be less and less sutable to cover it
dave
> -Mark
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/CFFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|