naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MKH 416 vs. ME67

Subject: Re: MKH 416 vs. ME67
From: "Jim Wells" whitby333
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2017 8:39 am ((PST))
Hey Russ,

Polar patterns, even with high end mics, aren't quite as exact as it might =
seem in the specs:).  A few degrees may make an audible difference in the s=
ubject bird's sound, that's true.  But the off-axis rejection remains the s=
ame, and is what you're buying a shotgun for.

Distance is also a big factor.  For example, the hyper-cardioid sensitivity=
 at a few feet (i.e., just out of a camera frame:) is much more directional=
, tight, and a few degrees makes much more difference close up.

At a distance of a few meters, even 3-4, the pattern is wider... read, more=
 forgiving:).  The 'sweet spot' broadens with distance.

And, as you become farther from your subject, the relationship between your=
 subject and ambient noise becomes less pronounced... this is when off axis=
 rejection becomes more important.

Subordinate considerations are:
Message: 1.  
Subject: Your style, how close you usually get
Message: 2.  
Subject: Your hunting grounds, how accesssble, how noisey
Message: 3.  
Subject: Your wallet:)

Hope this helps,
Jim

Have fun!
www.fantasonics.com






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU