Have any of you heard of or used a Batseeker 3? They're about AUD $60 with =
delivery on eBay, and claim to be frequency division with retained amplitud=
e. I'm wondering how they compare to the Batbox Baton, which is twice the p=
rice here. Their website is http://www.batseeker.com<http://www.batseeker.c=
om/>.
Apologies for all my recent bat detector postings, but there are very knowl=
edgeable people here whose input I greatly value. We mostly discuss normal =
recording here, but I guess bat recordings qualify equally as nature record=
ings?
Peter Shute
Sent from my iPad
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|