| Subject: | Re: Batseeker frequency division bat detector |
|---|---|
| From: | agriboval |
| Date: | Wed Apr 27, 2016 1:30 am ((PDT)) |
Yes that's right. I have not yet tested with the bat but the noise level is= very low, it looks much less sensitive than the Baton and in any case the = two have nothing to do compared to my old D230. .. But for the price of thi= s one there are modern possibilities much more interesting (micro USB Pette= rsson on eg smartphone).=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D Friendly, Antoine=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Batseeker frequency division bat detector, Peter Shute |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Dream despite blindness: to hear the Amazon jungle, parnould |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Batseeker frequency division bat detector, Peter Shute |
| Next by Thread: | Insurance Budgets, Harold Stiver |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU