naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Settings on Olympus LS-12 with AT2022 to minimize noise

Subject: Re: Settings on Olympus LS-12 with AT2022 to minimize noise
From: "Peter Shute" pshute2
Date: Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:37 pm ((PDT))
I agree. Many sites that offer any kind of comparison between recorders usu=
ally get out of date and stay out of date. =0D
=0D
> -----Original Message-----=0D
> From:  =0D
>  =0D
> Sent: Friday, 24 April 2015 1:09 AM=0D
> To:  [naturerecordists]=0D
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Settings on Olympus LS-12 =0D
> with AT2022 to minimize noise=0D
> =0D
>   =0D
> =0D
> Raimund, slightly offtopic, by this I would love to thank you =0D
> for this wonderful list! =0D
> =0D
> I share it every time someone asks me about which recorder to =0D
> buy. It's awesome that you're able to update it too. =0D
> =0D
> Thanks again, =0D
> =0D
> Jonas =0D
> =0D
> =E2=9C=BA =E2=9C=BA =E2=9C=BA=0D
> homepage <http://jonasgru.sk>  =0D
> =0D
> On 23 Apr 2015, at 17:06,  =0D
> [naturerecordists] wrote: =0D
> =0D
>               The actual impedance of a mic can vary from a =0D
> few ohms to a few Kohms and =0D
> =0D
>               this can swing the overall signal/noise levels =0D
> quite widely. For optimum =0D
> =0D
>               settings on a particular rig, in a particular =0D
> location, the only answer =0D
> =0D
>               comes from a experimental set of levels by =0D
> judging using ears. =0D
> =0D
> =0D
>       Sure, but considering the large number of options =0D
> available today, it is nearly impossible to test all =0D
> potential combinations of microphones and recorders in an =0D
> objective way by ear. So, it should help to have some =0D
> objective measurements at well-defined conditions. =0D
> =0D
> =0D
>       I also believe that the ears alone are not always the =0D
> best tool for evaluating the equipment. The problem here is =0D
> that one will need some kind of absolute reference in order =0D
> to compensate for the different microphone sensitivities and =0D
> recorder gain settings. A very experienced audio engineer =0D
> might be able to do that quite well, but others may to end up =0D
> with inaccurate results. =0D
> =0D
> =0D
>       I remember folks stating the Tascam HD-P2 had noisy =0D
> preamps, which was obviously based on judging using ears. =0D
> This was one of the reasons why I started the Microphone =0D
> Input Noise Comparison list 10 years ago... =0D
> =0D
> =0D
>       Regards, =0D
> =0D
>       Raimund =0D
> =0D
> =0D
>







"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU